Applying Conversational Solfege to Collegiate Aural Skills Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2994-7073.2026.39.219-250Keywords:
Conversational Solfege, Kodály Method, Kodály, Edwin GordonAbstract
Conversational Solfege (“CS”) is a sound-before-sight elementary music methodology developed by John Feierabend in 1995 that teaches music literacy through a twelve-step program modeled largely as a hybrid between the Kodály method and Edwin Gordon’s Music Learning Theory. Despite CS’s intended audience of music educators working with children, it applies remarkably well to the typical goals of collegiate aural skills instruction, corroborating many contemporary best practices while also offering new insights. In this article, I provide a conceptual and historical overview of the Conversational Solfege methodology and discuss its modified application to collegiate aural skills instruction, situating the methodology alongside contemporary collegiate pedagogical literature and providing applications of CS to typical collegiate aural skills topics via activities appropriate for each of the twelve steps. An appendix detailing a more thorough list of compatible activities categorized by step is included for reference.
Downloads
References
Alcalde, Bruno. 2018. “A Student-Centered Approach to Composing Popular Music in the Theory Classroom.” Engaging Students: Essays in Music Pedagogy 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18061/es.v6i0.7246
Alegant, Brian. 2014. “On ‘scuba diving,’ or the advantages of a less-is-more approach.” Engaging Students: Essays in Music Pedagogy 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18061/es.v2i0.7169
Bloom, Benjamin S. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. 1st ed. New York: Longmans, Green.
Burke, Kevin. 2013. “Hacking the Listening Guides: Bloom’s Taxonomy and Aural Learning.”Engaging Students: Essays in Music Pedagogy 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18061/es.v1i0.7157
Burt, Patricia and Philip Duker, 2022. “Student-Driven Music Theory: How the Question Formulation Technique Can Promote Agency, Engagement, and Curiosity.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 36: 33–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1406
Chenette, Timothy. 2018. “Reframing Aural Skills Instruction Based on Research in Working Memory.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 32: 3–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1190
—————. 2021. “What Are the Truly Aural Skills?” Music Theory Online 27, no.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30535/mto.27.2.2
Chenette, Timothy & Daniel Stevens. 2022. Foundations of Aural Skills. Utah Education Network Digital Press with Pressbooks. https://uen.pressbooks.pub/auralskills/.
Cleland, Kent D. & Paul Fleet, eds. 2021. Routledge Companion to Aural Skills Pedagogy. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429276392
De Clercq, Trevor. 2019. “The Nashville Number System: A Framework for Teaching Harmony in Popular Music.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 33: 3–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1199
Duker, Philip, Kris Shaffer, and Daniel Stevens. 2014. “Problem-Based Learning in Music: A Guide for Instructors.” Engaging Students: Essays in Music Pedagogy 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18061/es.v2i0.7175
Feierabend, John. 1983. The Effects of Specific Tonal Pattern Training on Singing and Aural Discrimination Abilities of First Grade Children. PhD diss., Temple University.
—————. 1994. The Book of Bounces. Chicago: GIA Publications.
—————. 2001. Conversational Solfege Teacher’s Manual Level 1. Chicago: GIA Publications.
—————. 2006. First Steps in Music for Preschool and Beyond. Chicago: GIA Publications.
Feierabend, John & Missy Strong, eds. 2018. Feierabend Fundamentals. Chicago: GIA Publications.
Feierabend Music Academy of Early Childhood. 2022. “FAME Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.” Accessed July 3, 2025. https://www.feierabendmusic.org/access_inlcusion/.
Folse, Stuart. 2004. “Popular Music as a Pedagogical Resource for Musicianship: Contextual Listening, Prolongations, Mediant Relationships, and Musical Form.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 18: 65–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1135
Gordon, Edwin. 2012. Learning Sequences in Music Theory. 8th ed. Chicago: GIA Publications.
Hoffman, Richard, William Pelto, and John W. White. 1996. “Takadimi: A Beat-Oriented System of Rhythm Pedagogy.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 10: 7–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1082
Houlahan, Micheál and Philip Tacka. 1990. “Sequential Order for the Preparation, Presentation, Practice and Evaluation of Rhythmic and Melodic Concepts.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 4: 243–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1024
Jimenez, Ivan. 2016. “Maximizing the Benefits of Using Familiar Music in Undergraduate Music Theory.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy E-Journal 6: 1–15.
Karpinski, Gary S. 2000. Aural Skills Acquisition: The Development of Listening, Reading, and Performing Skills in College-Level Musicians. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195117851.001.0001
London, Justin, William Pelto, and John W. White 1996. “A Psychological Addendum to Takadimi: A Beat-Oriented System of Rhythm Pedagogy.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 10: 31–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1083
Mariner, Justin & Peter Schubert. 2020. “Speaking Music.” in The Routledge Companion to Music Theory Pedagogy, edited by Leigh VanHandel, 187–99. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429505584-31
Marvin, Elizabeth West. 2007. “Absolute Pitch Perception and the Pedagogy of Relative Pitch.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 21: 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1147
Michaelsen, Garret. 2019. “Teaching with Radical Optimism: Mastery Learning in Music Theory.” Engaging Students: Essays in Music Theory Pedagogy 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18061/es.v7i0.7370
Palkki, Joshua. 2010. “Rhythm Syllable Pedagogy: A Historical Journey to Takadimi Via the Kodaly Method.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 24: 101–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1306
Peebles, Crystal. 2020. “Inclusion and agency in the undergraduate theory core.” Engaging Students: Essays in Music Pedagogy 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18061/es.v7i0.7361
Rifkin, Deborah and Philip Stoecker. 2011. “A Revised Taxonomy for Music Learning.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 25, no. 5: 155–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1267
Ristow, Gregory, Kathy Thomsen, and Diane Urista. 2014. “Dalcroze’s Approach to Solfege and Ear Training for the Undergraduate Aural Skills Curriculum.” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 28: 121–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1170
VanHandel, Leigh. 2012. “What Can Music Theory Learn from Mathematics Pedagogy?” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 26: 191–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71156/2994-7073.1258
VanHandel, Leigh. 2020. Routledge Companion to Music Theory Pedagogy. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429505584
Waller-Pace, Brandi. 2023. “Episode 2.14 – Dr. Brandi Waller-Pace.” Transcript, Diversify the Stand podcast, November 3. Accessed July 3, 2025. https://diversifythestand.org/transcripts/brandiwaller-pace.
Walters, Darrel L., and Cynthia Crump Taggart. 1989. Readings in Music Learning Theory. Chicago: GIA Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ryan Galik (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.